<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="includes/rss/rss_20.xsl" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">

<channel>
<title>Dirty Bastards Clan | Battlefield Series Gaming Community</title>
<link>http://www.dirtybastardsclan.com</link>
<description>Battlefield Series Gaming Community</description>
<copyright>Dirty Bastards Clan | Battlefield Series Gaming Community</copyright>
<generator>Dirty Bastards Clan | Battlefield Series Gaming Community Evo RSS 2.0 Parser</generator>
<ttl>60</ttl>


<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>xplicit702@yahoo.com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2010-09-05T09:17:08-05:00</dc:date>

<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2010-09-05T09:17:08-05:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>Team Warfare League Sign Ups</title>
<link>http://www.dirtybastardsclan.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=6</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br />
Team Warfare League is here again folks. We are signed up in 2 different ladders. We need to build our team roster on both competitions. Sign up on both if you are wanting to play. There will be a mandatory practice night TBD and all information will be posted in the forums.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Battlefield:  Bad Company 2 - NA 4v4 Squad Rush<br />
Battlefield:  Bad Company 2 - NA 8v8 Conquest<br />
&nbsp;]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">6@http://www.dirtybastardsclan.com</guid>
<dc:subject>Clan News</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-06-12T08:28:51-05:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by xplicit</dc:creator>
</item>

<item>
<title>The New York Times: “Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is a better game than Call of Du</title>
<link>http://www.dirtybastardsclan.com/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=5</link>
<description><![CDATA[<br />
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is a better game than Call of Duty: Modern  Warfare 2.<br />
Yup, I went there. I&rsquo;m not taking refuge in nuances. Unlike many  critics, I&rsquo;m not weaseling out of making a tough call by saying that  they are both great games.<br />
Of course they are both great games,  but no one can honestly reply, &ldquo;I don&rsquo;t care&rdquo; when asked if you should  pull into Burger King or McDonald&rsquo;s. (Other  suitable analogies: Toscanini versus von Karajan, Red Sox versus  Yankees, Ginger versus Mary Ann.)<br />
When it comes to these global  mass-market products, everyone has a favorite. And when it comes to the  latest generation of hard-core first-person combat shooters, I find Bad  Company 2, released recently by Electronic Arts for Windows PCs, the  Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3, more sophisticated, more immersive, a  boatload funnier and simply more interesting than Modern Warfare 2.<br />
I  think that phone ringing is Bobby Kotick, chief executive of Activision  Blizzard, publisher of the Call of Duty series, calling to tell me that  he&rsquo;s going to eat my heart for breakfast tomorrow while he enjoys his  world-class art collection. O.K., I&rsquo;m just joking about the threatened  ventricle roasting. But those are the sorts of passions involved in the  fight between E.A. and Activision for the loyalty (and money) of the  serious shooter fans who collectively spend millions of hours every day  playing these games.<br />
The Call of Duty franchise, after all, has  sold more than 55 million copies and generated around $3 billion in  retail sales over the past seven years. The most recent game in the  series, Modern Warfare 2, was the biggest commercial hit of 2009 and has  already become one of the best-selling games of all time.<br />
John  Riccitiello, the chief executive at Electronic Arts, had only one hope  of cracking Modern Warfare 2&rsquo;s stranglehold on today&rsquo;s shooter fan: the  Stockholm game studio E.A. acquired in 2006 that is known as DICE.<br />
As  recently as five years ago the Swedish company&rsquo;s Battlefield series was  riding high. If you were a serious online PC shooter fan in the middle  of the last decade, you were certainly playing Battlefield games. But  then Activision swiped the market. Moving the Call of Duty games from  World War II to the modern day made the games more exciting for many  players.<br />
The Call of Duty games included a robust offline  component, allowing  players to progress through a scripted story  surrounded by computer-controlled opponents and comrades, while the most  popular Battlefield games were essentially built to be played only  online against other people. And players of Call of Duty were able to  build a persistent online identity, so their virtual soldier would  become more capable and deadly over time; earlier Battlefield warriors  would almost always begin with the same abilities.<br />
With Bad  Company 2, the Battlefield series has now matched or exceeded the Call  of Duty series in each of these areas.<br />
First, modernity. Each  franchise is actually quite similar in its fictional setting. In both  series you play a Western soldier confronting a menace originating from  the former Soviet Union.<br />
But Bad Company 2 allows players to use a  much broader range of modern military materiel, including tanks,  helicopters, Humvees and other vehicles. More important, the virtual  environments in Bad Company 2 are much larger and more diverse than  those in Modern Warfare 2. Multiplayer battles in Modern Warfare 2 feel  like chaotic arenas with people running all over the place looking out  for themselves. In Bad Company 2, teamwork and voice communication are  essential; the combat environments are more interesting and feel more  akin to what I imagine a modern war zone to be.<br />
Yet the biggest  leap in Bad Company 2 is in its single-player campaign. It is only six  or eight hours long  &mdash;  comparable in length to the main story in Modern  Warfare 2  &mdash;  and while it is not propelled by scripted set pieces as  cinematic as those in the competition, Bad Company 2&rsquo;s narrative  glistens. The characters in Bad Company 2  &mdash;  the redneck, the hippie  pilot, the geek, the weathered sergeant  &mdash;  are profane, quirky and  usually hilarious. By contrast, the characters in Modern Warfare 2 are  somber, even dour. War is obviously serious business, but the characters  in Bad Company 2 seem to be having a lot more fun.<br />
And third,  DICE has now fine-tuned the persistent role-playing components of the  online game, by giving players a panoply of ways to advance their  characters and garner recognition from other users around the world.<br />
One  final technical note for consumers: Bad Company 2 is a game that needs  to be played on a powerful PC, rather than a console, in order to be  fully appreciated. I played mostly on a big rig from AMD, the  chip maker, that was able to produce some of the most beautiful graphics  I have seen in a shooter. Perhaps more important, the AMD machine came  with an ATI Radeon HD 5870 video card that is able to support  three monitors at once.<br />
The experience of playing on three  monitors, with the peripheral vision it allows, has simply been a  revelation. I will continue enthusiastically to use Intel and Nvidia-equipped  computers as well, but it may be impossible for me ever to return to a  single-monitor setup.<br />
As for the battle of the first-person  shooters, let it rage. It is players who are reaping the benefits of  this arms race between Activision and Electronic Arts. For now Bad  Company 2 is on top.<br />
Article is compliments of SETH SCHIESEL<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">5@http://www.dirtybastardsclan.com</guid>
<dc:subject>latestnews</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2010-04-12T15:58:52-05:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Posted by xplicit</dc:creator>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
